
42
J Gandhara Med Dent Sci
October - December 2025
et al. They discovered that the overall success rates for
Theriacal and MTA, respectively, were 98.1% and
99.3% among the 82 teeth available at the last follow-up
appointment.
23
In summary, the results of this study
support the eectiveness of MTA pulpotomy in adult
permanent teeth with irreversible Pulpitis and are in line
with previous research. According to the excellent
success rates documented in multiple studies, pulpotomy
can be a dependable substitute for conventional RCT if it
is carried out with the right case selection and technique.
The strengths of our study included its prospective
observational design, which reduced recall bias and
enhanced the quality of data collection and internal
validity. Pulpotomy was performed according to an
established protocol that included follow-up
radiographic evaluations, haemostatic protocol, and the
use of MTA. Clear inclusion criteria and stratied
analysis helped identify factors associated with better
outcomes (age, tooth location, and early intervention).
LIMITATIONS
Assessing long-term success or failure, such as internal
resorption or late periapical disease, may require a more
extended follow-up period than six months. Because the
study was limited to a single hospital, its ndings cannot
be applied to larger or more diverse populations, and
generalizability may be limited to similar clinical
settings and populations. Contextual comprehension of
efcacy is limited when a reference group (such as root
canal therapy or another pulpotomy material) is not
available. Absence of a control group (e.g., calcium
hydroxide or full pulpectomy) limited the ability to
compare MTA's ecacy against alternative treatments.
CONCLUSIONS
Pulpotomy using MTA in mature permanent teeth with
carious pulp exposure and recent irreversible Pulpitis
demonstrated a high short-term success rate of 88.6%,
especially in younger patients, maxillary teeth, and those
managed within 48 hours of symptom onset. These
results support MTA pulpotomy as a conservative and
effective alternative to RCT in appropriately selected
adult cases.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None
FUNDING SOURCES: None
REFERENCES
1. Zaeneldin A, Ollie YY, Chu CH. Eect of silver diamine uoride
on vital dental pulp: a systematic review. J Dent. 2022
Apr;119:104066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104066.
PMID: 35139409
2. Hu X, Liang Z, Wang Q, Liu L. A retrospective study of iRoot
BP Plus pulpotomy compared with Vitapex pulpectomy for
irreversible pulpitis of primary molars with the presence of
coronal pulp tissue. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2023 Mar;33(2):216-26.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13037. PMID: 36453980
3. Edwards D, Stone S, Bailey O, Tomson P. Preserving pulp
vitality: part two–vital pulp therapies. Br Dent J.
2021;230(3):148-55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-2599-y
4. Duncan HF. Present status and future directions—Vital pulp
treatment and pulp preservation strategies. Int Endod J.
2022;55(Suppl 3):497-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13688
5. Matoug-Elwerfelli M, ElSheshtawy AS, Duggal M, Tong HJ,
Nazzal H. Vital pulp treatment for traumatised permanent teeth: a
systematic review. Int Endod J. 2022;55(6):613-29.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13741
6. Taha NA, Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Conservative management of
mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure. J Endod.
2020;46(9S):S33-41 https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e17
7. Yoon JH, Choi SH, Koh JT, Lee BN, Chang HS, Hwang IN, et al.
Hard tissue formation after direct pulp capping with osteostatin
and MTA in vivo. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(2):e17.
https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e17i:10.5395/rde.2021.46.e1
8. Sha N, Munir MB, Virda M, Anwar M, Ali M, Rashid MS.
Evaluation of success of pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth
with carious exposure using mineral trioxide aggregate. Pak J
Med Health Sci. 2021;15(6):1352-5,
https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs211561352
9. Kang CM, Sun Y, Song JS, Pang NS, Roh BD. A randomised
controlled trial of various MTA materials for partial pulpotomy in
permanent teeth. J Dent. 2017;60:8-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.015
10. Zanini M, Hennequin M, Cousson PY. A review of criteria for
the evaluation of pulpotomy outcomes in mature permanent teeth.
J Endod. 2016 Aug;42(8):1167-74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.05.008
11. Elmsmari F, Ruiz XF, Miró Q, Feijoo-Pato N, Durán-Sindreu F,
Olivieri JG. Outcome of partial pulpotomy in cariously exposed
posterior permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Endod. 2019;45(11):1296-306.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.07.005
12. Rossi-Fedele G, Ng YL. Eectiveness of root canal treatment for
vital pulps compared with necrotic pulps in the presence or
absence of signs of periradicular pathosis: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2023;56(Suppl 3):370-94.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13833
13. Gulabivala K, Ng YL. Factors that aect the outcomes of root
canal treatment and retreatment—a reframing of the principles.
Int Endod J. 2023;56(Suppl 2):82-115.
https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13897
14. Mousa MA, Alshammari AM, Alshammari AZ, Alsharari MM,
Baig MN, Srivastava KC, et al. Comparative evaluation of
adequacy of root canal treatment performed by interns and
undergraduate dental students—a cross-sectional, retrospective
study. Appl Sci. 2022;12(18):9079.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189079
15. Mboowa D. A review of the traditional pulping methods and the
recent improvements in the pulping processes. Biomass Convers
Biorefin. 2024;14(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189079
16. Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Shahravan A, Saberi E, Baghban AA,
Parhizkar A. Outcomes of root canal therapy or full pulpotomy
using two endodontic biomaterials in mature permanent teeth: a
randomised controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(3):3287-
97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04310-y
17. Li Y, Wang W, Zeng Q, Tang M, Massey J, Bergeron BE, et al.
Efcacy of pulpotomy in managing irreversible pulpitis in mature
permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent.
2024;144:104923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104923
Success Rate of Pulpotomy in Curiously Exposed Mature