18
J Gandhara Med Dent Sci
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
:
:
April - June 2026
ACADEMIC STRAIN UNDER HORMONAL STRESS: PREMENSTRUAL SYNDROME AND
PREMENSTRUAL DYSPHORIC DISORDER AMONG FEMALE MEDICAL STUDENTS -
PREVALENCE AND ACADEMIC IMPACT
Sadia Shoukat
1
, Azra Ahmed
2
, Sakeena Ahmed
3
, Nusrat Jameel
4
,
Nazia Azam Yousfani
5
How to cite this article
Shoukat S, Ahmed A, Ahmed S,
Jameel N, Yousfani NA. Academic
Strain under Hormonal Stress:
Premenstrual Syndrome and
Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder
among Female Medical Students -
Prevalence and Academic Impact J
Gandhara Med Dent Sci. 2026; 13(2):
18-23.
Date Submission: 13-10-2025
Date Revised: 04-03-2026
Date Acceptance: 06-03-2026
2
Associate Professor and Consultant,
Department of Gynecology and
Obstetrics, Suleman Roshan Medical
College , Tando Adam
3
Assistant Professor and Consultant,
Department of Gynecology and
Obstetrics, Suleman Roshan Medical
College, Tando Adam
4
Senior Registrar and Consultant,
Department of Gynecology and
Obstetrics , Suleman Roshan Medical
College, Tando Adam
5
Associate Professor, Department of
Public Health, Suleman Roshan
Medical College, Tando Adam
Correspondence
1
Sadia Shoukat, Assistant Professor
and Consultant, Department of
Gynecology and Obstetrics, Suleman
Roshan Medical College, Tando Adam
+92- 334-2041601
nadiashoukat2010@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES
The study aims to determine the prevalence of premenstrual syndrome (PMS)
and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) among female medical
students and evaluate the impact these conditions have on the students’
academic performance.
METHODOLOGY
This cross-sectional study was conducted over two months at Suleman
Roshan Medical College, using a census to include all female medical
students with regular cycles and no major health conditions. Data were
collected via a structured questionnaire based on ICD-10 and DSM-5 criteria
to diagnose PMS and PMDD, and to assess academic impact. Participation
was voluntary, anonymous, and required informed consent. Data were
analyzed using SPSS version 23, employing both descriptive and inferential
statistics. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically signicant.
RESULTS
Study found high prevalence of premenstrual disorders among the 182
participants, with 90.1% meeting the criteria for PMS and 26.4% for PMDD.
The most common moderate-to-severe symptoms were fatigue 61.0%,
irritability 52.2%, and depressed mood 50.5%. Symptoms were strongly
associated with academic impairment, with over 70% of students reporting
negative eects on exam performance and concentration. A direct dose-
response relationship was observed, with increased symptom severity
associated with greater academic performance diculties.
CONCLUSION
This study concludes that premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual
dysphoric disorder are highly prevalent among female medical students and
are signicantly associated with substantial academic impairment.
KEYWORDS: Premenstrual Syndrome, Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder,
Academic Performance, Students, Medical
INTRODUCTION
Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a cyclical medical
condition marked by recurring physical and
psychological symptoms that appear during the luteal
phase of the menstrual cycle and subside shortly after
menstruation begins. Diagnosis requires three main
criteria: consistent symptom recurrence across most
menstrual cycles, signicant disruption of daily
activities, and ruling out other medical or psychiatric
conditions.
1
The International Classication of Diseases
ICD-10 species that PMS requires at least one
characteristic symptom, such as psychological
discomfort, bloating, breast tenderness, peripheral
edema, musculoskeletal pain, concentration issues,
sleep disturbances, or appetite changes that resolve with
the onset of menstruation.
2
A more severe form,
Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD), aects a
smaller group of individuals. According to DSM-5
criteria, diagnosing PMDD requires at least ve
symptoms, including at least one emotional symptom,
i.e., mood swings, irritability, depression, or anxiety,
along with possible physical symptoms.
3
Both
conditions negatively impact quality of life, but
PMDD’s emotional symptoms generally cause greater
psychosocial disruption.
4
Globally, 50 to 80% of
women of reproductive age experience premenstrual
symptoms, with 30 to 40% reporting moderate to severe
PMS needing treatment, and 3 to 8% meeting the
criteria for PMDD.
5
The eects of PMS/PMDD are
especially signicant in academic environments.
Studies from Brazil show PMS prevalence of 46.9%
among university students, with 11.1% meeting PMDD
criteria.
6
Similarly, data from a Pakistani medical
university indicates higher rates, 51.7% for PMS and
https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.13-2.803
19
J Gandhara Med Dent Sci
April - June 2026
5.8% for PMDD.
7
These conditions notably interfere
with learning, with 76.3% of aected students reporting
decreased academic performance, 79.2% struggling
with group discussions, and over 66% facing challenges
during evaluations.
8
This relationship is bidirectional:
neuroendocrine research demonstrates that cyclical
fluctuations in estrogen directly inuence cognition and
emotional regulation, while academic stressors, such as
demanding coursework and nancial pressures, may
worsen symptoms.
9,10,11
This creates a vicious cycle
where poor academic performance increases stress,
which further intensies premenstrual symptoms.
12,13
Although international data on PMS prevalence exist
and a few Pakistani studies have reported basic
prevalence rates among female medical students,
research examining its academic impact on medical
students in Pakistan is limited.
14,15,7,16,8,17
To our
knowledge, no such study has been conducted within
our institution. This study aims to ll this important gap
by examining the prevalence of PMS according to ICD-
10 criteria and PMDD based on DSM-5 criteria among
female medical students, while also evaluating its
academic eects to highlight the need for targeted
interventions, such as counseling services, cognitive
behavioral therapy, and institutional academic support
for students aected.
2,4
METHODOLOGY
A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based observational
study was conducted over two months at Suleman
Roshan Medical College. A complete enumeration
(census) sampling method was employed; all eligible
female medical students were invited to participate
voluntarily with informed consent, as the total
population was under 400, thereby enhancing statistical
power and eliminating sampling bias. Inclusion criteria
required participants to be female medical students of
the college with regular menstrual cycles over the
preceding 6 months and no known medical or
psychological disorders; individuals who did not meet
these criteria or who refused to participate were
excluded. Data were collected using a structured
questionnaire, developed by the research team, which
consisted of sections on socio-demographics,
gynecological history, and assessment of premenstrual
syndrome against ICD-10 diagnostic criteria, evaluation
of premenstrual dysphoric disorder against DSM-5
criteria, including the requisite ve symptoms and
functional impairment, and the academic impact of
these conditions. Symptom severity was classied as
none, mild, moderate, or severe using Sternfeld’s
criteria, and participants were specically instructed to
report symptoms that exhibited a cyclical pattern,
appearing in the luteal phase and resolving after
menstrual onset. The nal section included an open-
ended question that solicited students’ views on the
institutional support needed. The study received prior
approval from the Institutional Review Board, and
ethical standards were maintained through strict data
anonymization and voluntary informed consent. The
collected data were analyzed using IBM SPSS
Statistics. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies
and percentages, were used to summarize participants'
sociodemographic, gynecological, and clinical
characteristics. The prevalence of PMS and PMDD was
calculated as simple proportions. To evaluate the
association between PMS severity and academic
impairment, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
and Logistic regression were performed. The tests were
selected to compare the mean academic impact scores
across the ordinal categories of PMS severity (none,
mild, moderate, severe). A p-value of < 0.05 was
considered signicant.
RESULTS
Premenstrual Dysphoric
Disorder
P-value
No (n=134) Yes (n=48)
Age (years)
16 – 20 24 (17.9%) 10 (20.8%) 0.65
>20 110 (82.1%) 38 (79.2%)
Marital
Status
Single 127 (94.8%) 46 (95.8%) 0.900
Married 07 (5.2%) 02 (4.2%)
Academic
Year
1st year 28 (20.9%) 07 (14.6%) 0.707
2
nd
year 15 (11.2%) 03 (6.2%)
3
rd
year 29 (21.6%) 10 (20.8%)
4
th
year 25 (18.7%) 16 (33.3%)
5
th
year 37 (27.6%) 12 (25.0%)
Age at
menarche
(year)
<13 35 (26.1%) 20 (41.7%) 0.061
13 – 16 93 (69.4%) 23 (47.9%)
>16 06 (4.5%) 05 (10.4%)
Menstrual
Cycle Length
<21 days 15 (11.2%) 09 (18.8%) 0.078
21-35 days
110 (82.1%) 35 (72.9%)
>35 days 09 (6.7%) 04 (8.3%)
Bleeding
Duration
1-3 days 46 (34.3%) 13 (27.1%) 0.013*
4-5 days 75 (56.0%) 28 (58.3%)
≥6 days 13 (9.7%) 07 (14.6%)
Menstrual
Flow
Intensity
Too Light 21 (15.7%) 05 (10.4%) 0.332
Moderate 106 (79.1%) 38 (79.2%)
Heavy 07 (5.2%) 05 (10.4%)
Menstrual
Pain
Severity
None 10 (7.5%) 03 (6.2%)
0.001
Mild 46 (34.3%) 07 (14.6%)
Moderate 44 (32.8%) 22 (45.8%)
Severe 29 (21.6%) 12 (25.0%)
Very Severe
05 (3.7%) 04 (8.3%)
Family
History of
PMS/PMDD
Yes 96 (71.6%) 40 (83.3%) 0.128
No 37 (27.6%) 08 (16.7%)
Actions
Taken for
Symptoms
None 38 (28.4%) 12 (25.0%)
0.001
Take Pain
Relief Medi
cation
37 (27.6%) 20 (41.7%)
Heat pad 43 (32.1%) 13 (27.1%)
Massage 09 (6.7%) 02 (4.2%)
Take Consu
ltation
07 (5.2%) 01 (2.1%)
Table 1 (a): Association between Sociodemographic/Menstrual
Characteristics and Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) of
the participating medical students (N=182)
Academic Strain Under Hormonal Stress: Premenstrual Syndrome
20
J Gandhara Med Dent Sci
April - June 2026
Table 1(b): Association between Sociodemographic/Menstrual
Characteristics and Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) of the
Participating Medical Students (N=182)
Premenstrual Syndrome P-value
No (n=18) Yes
(n=164)
Age (years)
16 – 20 02 (11.1%) 32 (19.5%) 0.385
>20 16 (88.9%) 132
(80.5%)
Marital
Status
Single 17 (94.4%) 156
(95.1%)
0.900
Married 01 (5.6%) 08 (4.9%)
Academic
Year
1st year 03 (16.7%) 32 (19.5%) 0.707
2
nd
year 02 (11.1%) 16 (9.8%)
3
rd
year 02 (11.1%) 37 (22.6%)
4
th
year 04 (22.2%) 37 (22.6%)
5
th
year 07 (38.9%) 42 (25.6%)
Age at
menarche
(year)
<13 02 (11.1%) 53 (32.3%) 0.061
13 – 16 16 (88.9% 100
(61.0%)
>16 0 (0.0%) 11 (6.7%)
Menstrual
Cycle
Length
<21 days 0 (0.0%) 24
(100.0%)
0.078
21-35
days
18 (12.4%) 127
(87.6%)
>35 days 0 (0.0%) 13
(100.0%)
Bleeding
Duration
1-3 days 02 (11.1%) 57 (34.8%) 0.013*
4-5 days 16 (88.9%) 87 (53.0%)
≥6 days 0 (0.0%) 20 (12.2%)
Menstrual
Flow
Intensity
Too Light 04 (22.2%) 22 (13.4%) 0.332
Moderate 14 (77.8%) 130
(79.3%)
Heavy 0 (0.0%) 12 (7.3%)
Menstrual
Pain
Severity
None 03 (16.7%) 10 (6.1%)
0.001
Mild 13 (72.2%) 40 (24.4%)
Moderate 2 (11.1%) 64 (39.0%)
Severe 0 (0.0%) 41 (25.0%)
Very
Severe
0 (0.0%) 9 (5.5%)
Family
History of
PMS/PMDD
Yes 17 (94.4%) 119 (72.6%)
0.128
No 01 (5.6%) 44 (26.8%)
Actions
Taken for
Symptoms
None 15 (83.3%) 35 (21.3%)
0.001
Take Pain
Relief Med
ications
01 (5.6%) 56 (34.1%)
Heat pad 2 (11.1%) 54 (32.9%)
Massage 0 (0.0%) 11 (6.7%)
Take Cons
sultation
0 (0.0%) 8 (4.9%)
Table 2: Frequency and Severity of Premenstrual Symptoms
among Medical Students (N=182).
Symptoms None n
(%)
Mild n
(%)
Moderat
e n (%)
Severe
n (%)
Psycho
logical
Sympt
oms
Severity
Irritability
/mood
swings
31
(17.0%)
56
(30.8%)
53
(29.1%)
42
(23.1%)
Anxiety/te
nsion
43
(23.6%)
53
(29.1%)
55
(30.2%)
31
(17%)
Depressed
mood
42
(23.1%)
48
(26.4%)
55
(30.2%)
37
(20.3%)
Poor Concen
tration
54
(29.7%)
46
(25.3%)
62
(34.1%)
20
(11.0%)
Fatigue/Le
thargy
29
(15.9%)
42
(23.1%)
70
(38.5%)
41
(22.5%)
Sleep
disturbances
50
(27.5%)
58
(31.9%)
49
(26.9%)
25
(13.7%)
Physical
Sympt
oms
Severity
Breast
tenderness
93
(51.1%)
59
(32.4%)
27
(14.8%)
03
(1.6%)
Bloating/w
eight gain
83
(45.6%)
53
(29.1%)
39
(21.4%)
7
(3.8%)
Headaches
70
(38.5%)
56
(30.8%)
41
(22.5%)
15
(8.2%)
Muscle/joi
nt pain
45
(24.7%)
53
(29.1%)
59
(32.4%)
25
(13.7%)
Appetite
changes
48
(26.4%)
62
(34.1%)
60
(33.0%)
12
(6.6%)
Swelling
(hands/feet
117
(64.3%)
43
(23.6%)
17
(9.3%)
05
(2.7%)
Figure 1: Proportion of medical students diagnosed with
Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) based on ICD-10 criteria. Among
the 182 participants, the prevalence was 90.1% (n=164).
Academic Strain Under Hormonal Stress: Premenstrual Syndrome
21
J Gandhara Med Dent Sci
April - June 2026
Table 3: Prevalence and Severity of Academic Impairment
during Premenstrual Phase among Female Medical Students
(N=182)
Academic
Domain
Not at
all n
(%)
Slightl
y n
(%)
Moder
ately n
(%)
Severel
y n
(%)
Percentage
of students
experiencing
any
impairment
Class
concentrat
ion
54
(29.7%)
78
(42.9%)
42
(23.1%)
07
(3.8%)
70.3 %
Assignment
completion
68
(37.4%)
61
(33.5%)
41
(22.5%)
12
(6.6%)
62.6 %
Lecture
attendance
67
(36.8%)
55
(30.2%)
46
(25.3%)
14
(7.7%)
63.2 %
Study
group
participation
65
(35.7%)
63
(34.6%)
48
(26.4%)
06
(3.3%)
64.3 %
Academic
motivation
61
(33.5%)
57
(31.3%)
60
(33%)
04
(2.2%)
66.5 %
Group
work
60
(33%)
61
(33.5%)
53
(29.1%)
07
(3.8%)
67 %
Exam
performance
51
(28%)
53
(29.1%)
70
(38.5%)
08
(4.4%)
72 %
Figure 2: Association Between Premenstrual Syndrome Severity
and Academic Impairment Among Medical Students (N=182).
Bars represent mean academic impact scores with 95%
confidence intervals. Academic impairment demonstrates a
significant progressive increase with PMS severity (p < 0.001).
Table 4: Association between PMDD Diagnosis and Academic
Impact Areas (Chi-Square Tests)
Academic Impact Area
Pearson Chi-
Square Value
P-Value and
statistical
significance
Class Concentration 15.81 0.001
Group Participation 17.21 0.001
Academic Motivation 9.32 0.025
Exam Performance 9.27 0.026
Group Work 13.92 0.003
Assignments Completion 15.20 0.002
Lecture Attendance 10.46 0.015
DISCUSSION
Our study reveals considerable menstrual health
challenges faced by female medical students, with
90.1% experiencing PMS (as shown in Figure 1) and
24.6 % meeting criteria for PMDD. Additionally,
dysmenorrhea aected 92.9% of participants, with
63.7% reporting moderate to very severe pain. This
high burden translates directly into academic
impairment. A particularly strong nding was the dose-
response relationship; as PMS severity increased, so did
the level of academic diculty, a correlation that was
both statistically strong and educationally meaningful.
The results of the current study align with those of
Siregar et al., who also showed a direct relationship
between increasing premenstrual symptom severity and
its negative eect on academic performance. A similar
relationship was shown in a study of Iraqi medical
students, which revealed that 40% experienced
increased learning challenges, primarily manifesting as
a lack of concentration (50.1%) and trouble working
(42.7%).
18,19
However, it contrasts with the work of
Alemu et al., who found no signicant link, suggesting
that the unique pressures of medical education may
amplify these eects, variations in diagnostic criteria,
and sociocultural factors inuencing symptom
reporting. A key consistency with other literature is the
dominance of psychological symptoms over purely
physical complaints, highlighting the profound impact
on mental focus and motivation.
20,21
The PMDD
prevalence in this study (26.4%) is higher than the
16.3% and 13.8% reported by Omar et al. and Alemu et
al., respectively, yet remains lower than the 34.7%
documented by Minichil et al.
20,22,23
Whereas, the
prevalence of dysmenorrhea 92.9% matches exactly
with a study conducted at an Egyptian university on
female medical students. Worldwide, dysmenorrhea
rates vary widely, 16.8% to 94%, according to a WHO
review, suggesting that cultural and methodological
factors inuence these numbers.
24,25,26
A critical
analysis of our ndings with other studies reveals a
distinction between the perception of premenstrual
symptoms and their underlying pathology. While
students who perceived their menstrual pain as
impacting their academic performance were more likely
to develop PMDD, suggesting a notable cognitive-
affective component, our bivariate analysis identied a
later age at menarche as the statistically signicant
associated factor for a PMDD diagnosis. This contrast
implies that while subjective appraisal may amplify
distress, the development of PMDD may be
intrinsically linked to specic biological determinants
of reproductive development. In comparison, a PMS
diagnosis was more directly associated with greater
menstrual pain severity.
10,23,27
LIMITATIONS
This study’s limitations include its cross-sectional
design, which precludes causal inference, and its single-
Academic Strain Under Hormonal Stress: Premenstrual Syndrome
22
J Gandhara Med Dent Sci
April - June 2026
institution sample, which may limit generalizability.
Reliance on self-reported data introduces the possibility
of recall bias. Furthermore, the ndings may be
inuenced by the specic cultural context and the use
of subjective academic impact measures rather than
objective performance indicators. Future longitudinal,
multi-institutional studies incorporating clinical
assessments and objective metrics are recommended to
address these constraints.
CONCLUSIONS
This study conrms a high prevalence of premenstrual
syndrome among female medical students, with
symptom severity demonstrating a direct, dose-response
relationship to academic impairment. The signicant
disruption to exam performance and concentration
necessitates institutional recognition of this issue. These
findings provide compelling evidence for implementing
supportive policies, such as academic accommodations
and wellness resources, to promote educational equity
and student well-being.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None
FUNDING SOURCES: None
REFERENCES
1. Green LJ, O'Brien PMS, Panay N, Craig M; Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of premenstrual
syndrome. BJOG. 2017;124:e73–e105. doi:10.1111/1471-
0528.14260
2. World Health Organization. International statistical
classification of diseases and related health problems. 10th
revision (ICD-10). Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.
3. Yonkers KA. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of premenstrual
syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. UpToDate.
2008. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com
4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical
manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington (DC):
American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
5. Ryu A, Kim TH. Premenstrual syndrome: A mini review.
Maturitas. 2015;82(4):436-440.
doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.08.010 PMID:26358865
6. Rezende AP, Alvarenga FR, Ramos M, Franken DL, Costa JS,
Pattussi MP, et al. Prevalence of premenstrual syndrome and
associated factors among academics of a university in midwest
Brazil. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022;44:133-141.
doi:10.1055/s-0041-1741456 PMID:35349323
7. Nisar N, Zehra N, Haider G, Munir AA, Sohoo NA. Frequency,
intensity and impact of premenstrual syndrome in medical
students. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008;18(8):481-484.
PMID:18760073
8. Hashim R, Ayyub A, Hameed S, Qamar K, Ali S, Raza G.
Premenstrual syndrome: Messes with my academic
performance. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2014;64(2):199-203.
9. Jadoon NA, Yaqoob R, Raza A, Shehzad MA, Choudhry ZS.
Anxiety and depression among medical students: A cross-
sectional study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60(8):699-702.
PMID:20726214
10. Tolossa FW, Bekele ML. Prevalence, impacts and medical
managements of premenstrual syndrome among female
students: Cross-sectional study in College of Health Sciences,
Mekelle University, Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health.
2014;14:52. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-14-52 PMID:24629038
11. Parry BL, Nowakowski S, Martinez LF, Berga SL.
Premenstrual dysphoric disorder. In: Pfa DW, Arnold AP,
Etgen AM, Fahrbach SE, Rubin RT, editors. Hormones, Brain
and Behavior. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2009. p.
2945-2974. doi:10.1016/B978-008088783-8.00094-9
12. Hamdan-Mansour AM, Hamaideh SH, Arabiat DH, Azzeghaiby
SN. Psychosocial correlates of motivation for academic
accomplishment among university students. Procedia Soc Behav
Sci. 2014;159:32-36. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.323
13. Hamaideh SH, Al-Ashram SA, Al-Modallal H. Premenstrual
syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder among
Jordanian women. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs.
2014;21(1):60-68. doi:10.1111/jpm.12047 PMID:23701449
14. Bakhshani NM, Mousavi MN, Khodabandeh G. Prevalence and
severity of premenstrual symptoms among Iranian female
university students. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009;59(4):205-208.
PMID:19402278
15. Ezadi Z, Ramozi M, Barati H, Hosseini M, Hakimi S,
Mohammady N, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of
premenstrual syndrome among female university students of
reproductive age group in Kabul, Afghanistan: A cross-sectional
study. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2025;6(1):403-
411. doi:10.1089/whr.2024.0106
16. Kalsoom U, Sultana A, Amjad T, Bairam S. Prevalence of
premenstrual syndrome and knowledge assessment regarding its
prevention among medical students of a private medical college
of Islamabad. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2018;68(1):159-164.
17. Bukhari SS, Burki SA, Joiya RS, Ijaz F, Rahman F, Awan MA,
et al. Impact of examination stress on premenstrual syndrome
among female medical students. Ann King Edward Med Univ.
2023;29(Suppl 3):229-233. doi:10.21649/akemu.v29iSpl3.5576
18. Siregar MF. Stress levels and characteristics of medical faculty
students undergoing premenstrual syndrome and its association
with academic achievements. Stress. 2013;3(1).
19. Talib Hassan I, Saadi Issa H, Hussein EA, Ali Haddad R. The
effect of premenstrual tension on academic performance and
social interactions among Iraqi medical students. Cell Mol
Biomed Rep 2023;3(4):205-211. doi:10.55705/cmbr.2023.39010
1.1113
20. Alemu SM, Habtewold TD, Haile YG. Mental and reproductive
health correlates of academic performance among Debre Berhan
University female students, Ethiopia: The case of premenstrual
dysphoric disorder. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9348159.
doi:10.1155/2017/9348159 PMID:28567457
21. Tenkir A, Fisseha N, Ayele B. Premenstrual syndrome:
Prevalence and eect on academic and social performances of
students in Jimma University, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev.
2003;17(3):181-188. doi:10.4314/ejhd.v17i3.9838
22. Omara EI, Salama RA, Tadross TM, Ahmed SK, Mohamed
MG, Dewan SM, et al. Impact of premenstrual tension
syndrome on academic performance among female university
students from the United Arab Emirates: A cross-sectional
study. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(10):e70124.
doi:10.1002/hsr2.70124 PMID:39221471
23. Minichil W, Eskindir E, Demilew D, Mirkena Y. Magnitude of
premenstrual dysphoric disorder and its correlation with
academic performance among female medical and health
science students at University of Gondar, Ethiopia. BMJ Open.
2020;10(7):e034166. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034166
PMID:32665392
24. Shehata N, Arafa A, El Wahed HA, Fahim AS, Hussein GK.
Epidemiology of dysmenorrhea among university students in
Egypt. Int J Womens Health Wellness. 2018;4(1):073.
doi:10.23937/2474-1353/1510073
Academic Strain Under Hormonal Stress: Premenstrual Syndrome
23
J Gandhara Med Dent Sci
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
April - June 2026
LICENSE: JGMDS publishes its articles under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0).
COPYRIGHTS: Authors retain the rights without any restrictions to freely download, print, share and disseminate the article for any lawful purpose.
It includes scholarlynetworks such as Research Gate, Google Scholar, LinkedIn, Academia.edu, Twitter, and other academic or professional networking sites.
25. Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan KS. WHO
systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: A
neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health.
2006;6:177. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-177 PMID:16824213
26. Dahlawi H, Bukhari I, Alshammari F, Althaqib G, Alhawasawi
M, Bashiri R, et al. Eect of dysmenorrhea on academic
performance among students studying in Princess Nourah Bint
Abdulrahman University, Riyadh. Int J Med Dev Ctries.
2021;5(2):588-594. doi:10.24911/IJMDC.51-1608990432
27. Goweda RA, Alkot MM, Alturkistani FA, et al. Prevalence of
premenstrual dysphoric disorder among medical students of
Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia. World Fam
Med J. 2016;99:1-7.
Sadia Shoukat - Concept & Design; Data Acquisition; Data
Analysis/Interpretation; Drafting Manuscript; Critical
Revision; Supervision; Final Approval
Azra Ahmed - Concept & Design; Data Acquisition; Data
Analysis/Interpretation; Drafting Manuscript; Critical
Revision; Supervision; Final Approval
Sakeena Ahmed - Concept & Design; Data Acquisition; Data
Analysis/Interpretation; Drafting Manuscript; Critical
Revision; Supervision; Final Approval
Nusrat Jameel - Concept & Design; Data Acquisition; Data
Analysis/Interpretation; Drafting Manuscript; Critical
Revision; Final Approval
Nazia Azam Yousfani - Concept & Design; Data Acquisition;
Data Analysis/Interpretation; Critical Revision; Supervision;
Final Approval
AUTHORS CONTRIBUTION
The authors accept responsibility for all aspects of the work
and will ensure that any concerns regarding the accuracy or
integrity of any part are properly investigated and resolved.
Academic Strain Under Hormonal Stress: Premenstrual Syndrome