Electric Pulp Tester Response Thresholds Across Electrode Placement Sites in Maxillary and Mandibular Anterior Teeth: A Cross-Sectional Study
Keywords:
Dental Pulp, Electric Pulp Tester, Electrode Placement Site, Maxillary anterior teeth, Mandibular Anterior Teeth, Pulp Sensory Threshold, Response ThresholdAbstract
OBJECTIVES
To compare the Electric Pulp Tester (EPT) response thresholds at different electrode placement sites (incisal edge, third, middle third, and cervical third) in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.
METHODOLOGY
This cross-sectional study was carried out from December 2022 to March 2023. This study included individuals from the age range of 18 – 60 years. Six teeth of 60 individuals were assessed in the study. Randomly, either the right or left side of the arch was selected. EPT was performed on each tooth at four different sites (incisal edge, incisal third, middle third, cervical third, labially). The reading was noted when the individual felt tingling or warmth in the tooth. The digital readout at which the participant felt the sensation was considered the threshold. The data was analyzed using R/RStudio. Means of variables from each location were compared using ANOVA and Pair sample t Test while the critical level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS
No statistically significant differences were observed in EPT readings between maxillary and mandibular teeth across the tested regions (p > 0.05). In maxillary anterior teeth, significant differences were found across the four areas, with the middle third of central and lateral incisors (15.77 ± 8.13, p = 0.045; 16.30 ± 8.70, p = 0.032) and the cervical third of canines (17.58 ± 10.76, p = 0.028) showing the lowest threshold values. In contrast, no significant variations were observed in the mandibular anterior teeth across the four regions (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The middle third of maxillary anterior teeth may be an optimal site for EPT electrode placement. However, no significant differences were noted across regions for mandibular anterior teeth.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Igna A, Mircioagă D, Boariu M, Stratul ȘI. A diagnostic insight of dental pulp testing methods in pediatric dentistry. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 May 16;58(5):665
Molaasadolah F, Zargar N, Bargrizan M, Akbari F, Kardouni Khozestani P, Sabour S, Bakhshi M. Comparison of pulse oximeter, cold test, and electric pulp test for assessment of pulp vitality in permanent immature teeth. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2022;64(1):134-42
Sui H, Lv Y, Xiao M, Zhou L, Qiao F, Zheng J, et al. Relationship between the difference in electric pulp test values and the diagnostic type of pulpitis. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 10;21(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01696-9
Tenyi A, Nemeth L, Golež A, Cankar K, Milutinović A. Comparison of the vitality tests used in dental clinical practice and histological analysis of the dental pulp. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2022 Jun 1;22(3):374-81
França CM, Riggers R, Muschler JL, et al. 3D-imaging of whole neuronal and vascular networks of the human dental pulp via CLARITY and light sheet microscopy. Sci Rep. 2019;9:10860
Campos RE, Filho PCFS, Resende EF, Oliveira LV, Ambrosano GMB. Comparative evaluation of dental pulp tests in pulpal status diagnostics. J Oral Res. 2022;11(2):1-11
Saklecha P, Kishan KV, Shroff MG. Comparison of pulp sensibility test responses in normotensive and hypertensive individuals: A clinical study. J Conserv Dent. 2022;25:526-30
Serefli ED, Bayram HM, Eren I. The effect of different conductive substances on the response of electric pulp test. J Stoma. 2020;73(6):289-94
Zhang Y, Kelly JR. Dental ceramics for restoration and metal veneering. Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;61(4):797-819
Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part I: General information and thermal tests. Int Endod J. 2010;43:738-62
Farhad-Mollashahi N, Moghadam MF, Aslani SM, Mollashahi F. Pulp sensibility tests responses in patients with anxiety and depression. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 May 1;14(5):e380-e384
Bargale SD, Padmanabh SKD. Appropriate electrode placement site of electric pulp tester for the premolars: A clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;33(2):138-42
Udoye C, Jafarzadeh H, Okechi UC, Aguwa EN. Appropriate electrode placement site for electric pulp testing of anterior teeth in Nigerian adults: A clinical study. J Oral Sci. 2010;52:287-92
Donyavi Z, Khoshbin E, Ahmadi B, Farhadian M, Esmaeilzadeh M. Optimal electrode placement site for electric pulp testing of second molar. Ann Dent Spec. 2018;6(2):94-9
Bender IB, Landau MA, Fonseca S, Trowbridge HO. The optimum placement-site of the electrode in electric pulp testing of the 12 anterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989;118:305-10
Kalhoro FA, Khoso NA, Salem MA, Shaikh MA. Selecting the appropriate electrode placement site for pulp tester on first premolar teeth. Pak Oral Dent J. 2012;32(1):132-5
Lilja J. Sensory differences between crown and root dentin in human teeth. Acta Odontol Scand. 1980;38(5):285-91
Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part II: Electric pulp tests and test cavities. Int Endod J. 2010;43:945-8
Moody AB, Browne RM, Robinson PP. A comparison of monopolar and bipolar electrical stimuli and thermal stimuli in determining the vitality of human teeth. Arch Oral Biol. 1989;34(9):701-5
Segura-Egea JJ, Cisneros-Cabello R, Llamas-Carreras JM, Velasco-Ortega E. Pain associated with root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2009 Jul;42(7):614-20
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shafqat Ali Shah, Fawad Ali Shah, Laila Gul, Rizwan Ullah Afridi, Ayesha Noor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
